.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

children in need

children in need. Children in Need/The X
  • Children in Need/The X



  • :DRS:Church
    Aug 23, 08:31 PM
    there goes all those iTunes sales:rolleyes:





    children in need. Children in Need 2008
  • Children in Need 2008



  • asleep
    Mar 23, 05:42 PM
    Don't drink and drive.





    children in need. Children in Need charity
  • Children in Need charity



  • 2 Replies
    Mar 29, 02:58 PM
    As much as I doubt that much massive growth, I'm more entertained by the "NEGATIVE" responses.
    Not that I agree with them, (because I don't... I've used the WP7 and it's a decent phone with features people like that iOS will NEVER have)...
    but mainly because having a negative reaction to a guess as to how other people will spend their money is such a infinitely retarded thing to do. X-D
    Seriously, why the hell do any of you even care what type of phone other people decide to use? If you really DO like your iPhone, then you wouldn't.
    Only an imbecil would make a personal purchase decision based mainly on what other people do.
    The only reason anyone would care (besides being a stockholder, or Apple employee) would be that more than actually liking the phone itself you've bought the phone because you're a joiner.... you want to be 'popular' or in a 'majority'.
    (Which honestly is a PATHETIC reason to make ANY purchase.)

    X-D

    (btw, yes I'm an iPhone owner)





    children in need. for BBC Children in Need
  • for BBC Children in Need



  • infidel69
    Apr 19, 11:51 AM
    Apple keeps burning bridges and eventually it's going to come back to bite them in the ass. Samsung is holding all the cards here. Apple needs Samsung but Samsung doesn't need Apple. I wouldn't be surprised if Sammy has some unexpected production issues with ipad parts here shortly.





    children in need. with Children In Need,
  • with Children In Need,



  • mcmlxix
    Mar 29, 01:46 PM
    Finder does not support Cut and Paste for files, and is unlikely to do so. Its a philosophical difference, and to bring that up as an example of Win7 superiority is silly, at best. Apple could easily implement it, but they choose not to. Its another one of those "One button Mouse" deals, where Apple is being obstinate.

    But what then is Apple’s philosophy regarding cut & paste to move a file? Drag and drop should be used instead?

    This would be valid if Finder had a collapsible hierarchy in the menu bar; but it doesn’t. Who wants to alias every folder on to the menu bar? This would be valid if dragging a file (or folder) in one Finder window scrolled easily up and down. It’s dodgy at best.

    Should multipleFinder window should have to be open, even if they don’t snap together so you have to spend a lot of time resizing and moving windows?

    As for 2 button mice, sure Apple doesn’t have one, but that’s disingenuous, because of all intents and purposes, 1-finger click/tap = left button and 2-finger click/tap = right button.





    children in need. Print Comment Email. Pudsey
  • Print Comment Email. Pudsey



  • daneoni
    Aug 31, 09:03 PM
    WHo cares, frankly i'm tired of all these Apple rumor crap. Its been three tuesdays in a row and we havent seen anything yet. Its been almost a year and we have no new iPods.

    New resolution: I'll buy something when i need it. No more holding out for PowerBook G5 Tuesdays.......Psych!

    PS I love my PowerBook!





    children in need. Children In Need 2006 was
  • Children In Need 2006 was



  • jaknudsen
    Apr 13, 06:33 AM
    Whether you call it "AirTunes" or "AirPlay audio", MagnusVonMagnum is still right - the thread title is misleading.





    children in need. Children who need sponsored
  • Children who need sponsored



  • laidbackliam
    Oct 13, 01:59 AM
    It's like those audiophiles who argue endlessly about if gold plated or silver plated speaker wire sounds better.

    true, but there is a parralel could be drawn between audiophiles and mac "zealots".


    and its fiber optic vs copper plated. its the rca connectors taht would be gold or silver plated, and yes, gold sounds better, transfers signal better.


    my two cents :)





    children in need. Green / Children in Need
  • Green / Children in Need



  • Kupp
    Mar 23, 01:18 PM
    As a long time PC user who is just getting frustrated with the windows experience, I am looking forward to seeing what Mac has to offer in the coming months.

    I picked up an Iphone 4 last december and when I had a problem, being able to go to a retail location where they looked at my device for 5 minutes and then gave me a new one was great.

    My wife is a mac user, and being able to go to a retail location for problems just can't be beaten.

    Now I must say, I have been a Dell person all my life, heck I am currently typing this on my 6 year old dell laptop that still works fine by me. Hell, she will still be fine for fitting my laptop needs. I have been using her primarily has a desktop hooked up to many many peripherals as well as a 2nd screen for dual output.

    In replacing her I have been eyeing the smaller Imac for some time now, hooking up a second screen output, and grabbing a magic trackpad that I enjoyed playing with at the Apple Store.

    Anything larger than 22 or so inches would be overkill for me, as I am planning for at least two screens. Heck I think I am just using a 19 inch crt monitor that is 11 years old and my 15 inch laptop screen right now.

    So a nice high quality screen with a 2nd monitor for surfing and chat room utilization would be all I need. My backup thought is a mac mini with two screens, but the Mac Mini's appear to be much lower specs when compared with the Imac.

    *1st post





    children in need. BBC Children In Need Case
  • BBC Children In Need Case



  • AidenShaw
    Mar 23, 11:15 PM
    wait till they see the price of the new tb drives people will choke...

    $49 for a TB drive





    children in need. for Children In Need Rocks
  • for Children In Need Rocks



  • oootle
    Sep 5, 03:21 PM
    Showtime (with it having a capital S) could be the name of a new application?

    or maybe not, fun to speculate anyway lol





    children in need. Children in Need
  • Children in Need



  • roland.g
    Apr 25, 01:44 PM
    Could it finally be? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H0K1k54t6A)





    children in need. for children that need a
  • for children that need a



  • DRewPi
    Sep 9, 10:26 AM
    New Ipods .... that's kool .....
    New video movie store .... good !!!

    We need some new MBP AND MB !!!

    These cpus need an update really bad ... compared to what is goin to come out with the other pd competitors in two weeks with the C2D

    I saw on a shope u can get an C2D Labtop for 856 bucks !!??!!!

    that is pretty scary since the MB is more expensive and got Core Duos !!! :confused:





    children in need. Children in Need
  • Children in Need



  • afields
    Sep 12, 02:21 PM
    let the whining begin





    children in need. Children in Need#39;s
  • Children in Need#39;s



  • Chris Bangle
    Sep 1, 03:29 AM
    I reckon Steves easily got rights to sell uk movies on itunes, hoping touchscreen thing, uk shows and moives and a iphone.

    Has anyone seen how awesome this looks...
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/samsung-ypk5-mp3-mini-boombox-first-unboxing-review-and-video-198099.php





    children in need. Some children need to be in a
  • Some children need to be in a



  • monaarts
    Apr 4, 11:50 AM
    I'm sorry but those guys deserved it. Why should the mall guard have to wait until his life in in danger before putting someone else's life in danger? Those guys were breaking the law and could have given someone a heart attack or something so screw that! Mall security guard +1 for sure! You rock man!


    - Joe





    children in need. for children in need
  • for children in need



  • dolph0291
    Mar 30, 01:18 PM
    They are bothered because they want to be able to describe their app store. They want to be able to say:

    "We have this thing called Marketplace. What is it? Well, it's a place where you can by apps. Think of it as a grocery store for apps. You know, an app store."

    In the Windows world, it would be a Program Store. Look at any Windows computer and there's nothing called an application or an app. MS claims to have, like 95% of the desktop market. How would the gazillion Windows users out there even know what an "app" was? They've had zero exposure to it, it's a totally foreign term. Wait a minute, it's an Apple term that is coming into common usage and now MS might have to change their language to get rid of the goofy term "program", conceding defeat, so its usage must be stopped or curtailed. That's what this is really about.





    children in need. Children in Need pictures
  • Children in Need pictures



  • candybaws
    Mar 30, 11:46 AM
    This whole situation reminds me of this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_vs._MikeRoweSoft).





    children in need. for Children in Need
  • for Children in Need



  • jaydub
    Aug 28, 11:06 PM
    Acctually what gets old is a look of the same thing for the long time. Now the Powerbook look is awesome, so improve upon it. All of us wishing for a new enclosure are not screaming we want a 17" White MB no no no. We are saying just change it up.

    I always find it so funny these apple followers (not you, one I am posting to) that preach about how innovative apple is, but then minute another apple follower demands change, we get our torches, tar, and chicken feathers...

    My dream would be a refined Powerbook look. Perhaps in a gunmetal (that super dark grey) still aluminum looking though.
    Don't get me wrong, I would welcome a new enclosure but I think that allowing the prospect of one to be the determining factor in the purchase of a machine is ridiculous. As much as I would LOVE to have a gunmetal colored mbp, if it came out tomorrow I wouldn't be upset that I have a silver one because I truly do love my machine. Apple will always continue to innovate and release new products, and IMO now that they're using intel chips the rate of obsolescence will increase (in terms of harware and performance more than appearance).





    mrkramer
    Apr 25, 03:13 AM
    i thought this from my first post, but his join date is 08, and he's a regular. that is what has me thinking that what he is saying is really how he thinks/acts.

    I looked through some of his older posts, and while none of them are quite as obvious about how shallow and uncaring he is you can tell that he probably doesn't include the whole story. For example, he likes to argue with his neighbors (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=978345&highlight=) I'm guessing that we only got half the story in that thread. Sounds like he was pretty rude in an Apple store. (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=644656&highlight=) and one quote from that thread:

    I want the genius I dealt with to get in a car wreck tonight. I want to deal with the genius you got.

    Don
    plus parking in a handicapped spot. (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=928429&highlight=) So based on past examples of his attitude here, I think this is really the way he thinks, not just an attempt to troll.





    nsayer
    Mar 23, 04:46 PM
    They are couching this as a fight against drunk driving, but Trapster primarily is about alerting you to speed traps, red light cameras and other purely revenue generating tools used by local cops and insurance companies to take your money from you using the fig leaf of allegedly improving traffic safety.

    pro-tip: You want to reduce red light crashes? Make the yellow light longer. Oh but that won't make you more money in traffic fines. Oops. In actual fact, many communities that have put in red light cameras have been caught cheating - REDUCING the length of the yellow lights beyond the minimums in the MUTCD.

    If they ban Trapster from the store I solemnly swear that I will make it my life's work to build a web-based replacement that they can't ban.





    macenforcer
    Oct 12, 03:39 PM
    You do realize HIV effects women differently than men? It also effects children differently than adults.

    Do yourself a favor and do a quick google on how much money has been spent on HIV research and prevention for children and women, compare that to men with HIV. Then do a search on children/women with HIV and mortality rates compared to men w/HIV.

    We live in a very sexist society. HIV research was never funded or taken seriously by society at large until heterosexual white men started to develop AIDS.


    Ha ha, You are nuts. Let me tell you how it works.

    Nobody gets rich by curing a disease. That is why diabetes, AIDS, HIV etc are all treated with "Keep you alive but not cure you drugs" that you have to buy for the rest of your life. The government and drug companies are in it together and are pure evil. Ain't nobody going to cure anything unless they can keep making money doing it. Get it? Good.





    Optimus Frag
    Apr 23, 12:54 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Aren't intel in the process on implementing Open CL?





    cozmot
    Mar 21, 02:16 PM
    The point is that MisterMe said nothing that your response would have fit. You can infer all you want, but it's very clear that MisterMe was talking about the market share myth, and was not inferring that Macs are immune to malware.

    No, I just took the first example you posted and saw that it didn't prove your point at all.

    That's quite true.

    Using your STD example, I have zero need for protection if my wife and I are exclusive with each other, as we are. Likewise, protection isn't currently necessary for a Mac if the user exercises reasonable care and caution. If you want to run AV on your Mac, it's perfectly within your right. It's just not needed for protection.

    You alone have the power to stop reading or posting in this thread.

    It's not turning a mountain into a mole hill to stand by accurate, factual statements when they're challenged. It's not a "status-quo"; it's the current reality in the Mac computing world. No one is saying that it couldn't change in the future. It just hasn't yet.

    You have no idea what attitude "most Mac users" have, unless you've interviewed the many millions of them. If I exercise the reasonable care that I've already described, it can't happen to me, in the current computing environment. If that situation ever changes, such as the introduction of a true Mac virus into the wild, any antivirus app I may have installed today will provide no protection from that event.

    It's called "profit motive", which any successful company has.

    Again, a personal opinion. Like millions of others, I find their hardware options perfectly acceptable and I don't have a problem with their pricing. If that weren't true, I and millions of others simply wouldn't buy from them.

    No one is suggesting that you shouldn't be careful. In fact, that's exactly what we've been saying: if you're careful, you don't need antivirus software to protect your Mac from malware.

    I think GGJstudios answered MagnusVonMagnum's contentions, misrepresentations and straw-man arguments perfectly. And Magnus, I hope that you're truly sick of this thread, because I am too with your belaboring the same points, putting words in peoples' mouths and contributing nothing to this thread. Really, enough already! Quit reading and posting here, and get well soon.